Corporate energy buyers and technology firms can no longer rely on historical net metering assumptions when evaluating onsite solar economics or distributed energy business models. Profitability will hinge on the details of asymmetric tariffs, which determine when exports are worth little and when self-consumption or storage provides superior value. Firms that embed these dynamics into digital platforms, project finance models, and customer offers will outcompete rivals that still treat net metering as a simple bill credit.
Key Risk
Inability to adapt to asymmetric net metering regulations may lead to decreased profitability for solar prosumers relying on outdated systems.
Strategic Opportunity
Invest in advanced digital management and storage solutions to optimize energy production and consumption consistent with new tariff structures.
Historical Context
The evolution of net metering regulations for rooftop solar installations marks a pivotal shift in the distributed energy landscape. Historically, net metering allowed solar prosumers to offset their consumption with production at a nearly equal rate, incentivizing straightforward solar adoption. Recently, regulatory bodies have been adopting asymmetric net metering schemes, which differentiate the value of electricity imports from exports based on time of use.
Read more: Optimal Solar Investment and Operation under Asymmetric Net →
Subscribe to The Keel for systematic foresight delivered to your inbox.